AMDY vs UJAN
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, AMDY or UJAN?
AMDY has been ahead.
UJAN has a lower expense ratio. AMDY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMDY | UJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $501M | $252M |
| Dividend Yield | 69.36% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 15 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +107.29%Best | +7.66% |
| 1Y Return | +111.76%Best | +11.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +50.68%Best | +12.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.29% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 57.5% | 5.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -9.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $34,980Best | $14,107 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2023 | Dec 31, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 19, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
AMDY vs UJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
AMDY vs UJAN Performance
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January (UJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year AMDY returned +111.76% while UJAN returned +11.00%. Year to date, AMDY is up 107.29% versus a gain of 7.66% for UJAN.
Over three years, AMDY compounded at +50.68% per year against +12.22% for UJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMDY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 57.5% compared with 5.8% for UJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for AMDY and -9.0% for UJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMDY charges 1.00% per year while UJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $79 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMDY currently yields 69.36% against 0.00% for UJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMDY and UJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMDY or UJAN?
AMDY has an expense ratio of 1.00% while UJAN charges 0.79%. UJAN is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMDY or UJAN?
Over the past year AMDY returned +111.76% vs +11.00% for UJAN, so AMDY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMDY or UJAN?
AMDY has been the more volatile fund at 57.5% annualized versus 5.8% for UJAN. Worst drawdown: AMDY -53.9% vs UJAN -9.0%.
Should I hold both AMDY and UJAN?
AMDY and UJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMDY or UJAN?
AMDY yields 69.36% while UJAN yields 0.00%, so AMDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UJAN better than AMDY?
UJAN has a lower expense ratio. AMDY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.