AMGR vs VTI

AMGR vs VTI

Which is better, AMGR or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAMGRVTI
Expense Ratio0.61%0.03%Best
AUM$7M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings583,524
YTD Return+2.33%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight59.8%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyAmana Mutual Funds TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 24, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AMGR vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AMGR vs VTI Performance

Amana Growth ETF (AMGR) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AMGR is up 2.33% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AMGR charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

AMGR already in VTI76.6%
VTI already in AMGR28.9%

76.6% of AMGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.9% of VTI's money is in holdings AMGR also owns.

Most of AMGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

24 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 58 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AMGR (68.7% of the fund), and 0 for AMGR that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AMGRWeight in VTIDifference
AAPLApple, Inc8.20%6.30%1.90%
NVDANvidia Corp7.28%6.88%0.40%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.96%5.11%0.85%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc6.77%2.70%4.07%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.73%2.38%3.35%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.4.39%1.33%3.06%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc4.38%1.04%3.34%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.3.01%0.61%2.40%
NOWServicenow, Inc.3.35%0.21%3.14%
JCIJohnson Controls International Plc3.12%0.11%3.01%

76.6% of AMGR is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AMGRVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AMGR or VTI?

AMGR has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AMGR and VTI?

76.6% of AMGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.9% of VTI's is in holdings AMGR also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, AMGR or VTI?

AMGR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than AMGR?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.