AMID vs VFMF
Argent Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard US Multifactor ETF
Which is better, AMID or VFMF?
VFMF has been ahead.
VFMF has a lower expense ratio. VFMF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VFMF is less concentrated, with 9.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMID | VFMF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.44% |
| Holdings | 48 | 655 |
| YTD Return | +7.28% | +20.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.87% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | +22.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $14,980 | $19,385Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.5% | 9.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Architect | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2022 | Feb 13, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.2 years).
AMID vs VFMF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
AMID vs VFMF Performance
Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and Vanguard US Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMID returned +6.87% while VFMF returned +27.58%. Year to date, AMID is up 7.28% versus a gain of 20.44% for VFMF.
Over three years, AMID compounded at +12.21% per year against +22.35% for VFMF. Across the full 4-year window we track, VFMF has the edge at +17.07% annualized vs +10.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 16.6% for VFMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for AMID and -20.6% for VFMF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMID charges 0.52% per year while VFMF charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $18 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMID currently yields 0.33% against 1.44% for VFMF.
Holdings Overlap
44.5% of AMID's money is in holdings VFMF also owns. 3.6% of VFMF's money is in holdings AMID also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AMID and 654 in VFMF, against full books of 48 and 655.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 609 positions for VFMF that do not appear in our book for AMID (93.6% of the fund), and 26 for AMID that do not appear in VFMF (51.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMID | Weight in VFMF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 4.99% | 0.11% | 4.88% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 3.29% | 0.13% | 3.16% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 2.99% | 0.26% | 2.73% |
| TWLOTwilio Inc. Class A | 2.90% | 0.06% | 2.84% |
| ILMNIllumina, Inc. | 2.73% | 0.19% | 2.54% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.19% | 0.53% | 1.66% |
| USFDUS Foods Holding Corp | 2.49% | 0.13% | 2.36% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 2.53% | 0.07% | 2.46% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.22% | 0.19% | 2.03% |
| OASChord Energy Corp | 2.06% | 0.28% | 1.78% |
44.5% of AMID is already inside VFMF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMID or VFMF?
AMID has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VFMF charges 0.18%. VFMF is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMID or VFMF?
Over the past year AMID returned +6.87% vs +27.58% for VFMF, so VFMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMID annualized +10.10% vs +17.07% for VFMF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMID or VFMF?
AMID has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 16.6% for VFMF. Worst drawdown: AMID -23.1% vs VFMF -20.6%.
Should I hold both AMID and VFMF?
AMID and VFMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMID and VFMF?
44.5% of AMID's money is in holdings VFMF also owns. 3.6% of VFMF's is in holdings AMID also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AMID and 654 in VFMF.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMID or VFMF?
AMID yields 0.33% while VFMF yields 1.44%, so VFMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VFMF better than AMID?
VFMF has a lower expense ratio. VFMF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VFMF is less concentrated, with 9.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.