AMID vs VFQY
Argent Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
Which is better, AMID or VFQY?
VFQY has been ahead.
VFQY has a lower expense ratio. VFQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VFQY is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMID | VFQY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.13%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $493M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 48 | 452 |
| YTD Return | +7.28% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.87% | +15.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | +16.23%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -20.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $14,980 | $16,278Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.5% | 13.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Architect | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2022 | Feb 13, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.2 years).
AMID vs VFQY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
AMID vs VFQY Performance
Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMID returned +6.87% while VFQY returned +15.57%. Year to date, AMID is up 7.28% versus a gain of 12.43% for VFQY.
Over three years, AMID compounded at +12.21% per year against +16.23% for VFQY. Across the full 4-year window we track, VFQY has the edge at +12.30% annualized vs +10.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.3% for VFQY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for AMID and -20.7% for VFQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMID charges 0.52% per year while VFQY charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $13 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMID currently yields 0.33% against 1.04% for VFQY.
Holdings Overlap
30.4% of AMID's money is in holdings VFQY also owns. 6.3% of VFQY's money is in holdings AMID also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AMID and 469 in VFQY, against full books of 48 and 452.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 441 positions for VFQY that do not appear in our book for AMID (91.8% of the fund), and 30 for AMID that do not appear in VFQY (63.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMID | Weight in VFQY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEDPMedpace Holdings Inc | 3.44% | 0.41% | 3.03% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.19% | 1.49% | 0.70% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 3.29% | 0.29% | 3.00% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 2.28% | 1.27% | 1.01% |
| ILMNIllumina, Inc. | 2.73% | 0.37% | 2.36% |
| USFDUS Foods Holding Corp | 2.49% | 0.30% | 2.19% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 1.71% | 0.94% | 0.77% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.22% | 0.20% | 2.02% |
| HNGEHinge Health Inc | 2.27% | 0.03% | 2.24% |
| VTRSViatris | 2.04% | 0.05% | 1.99% |
30.4% of AMID is already inside VFQY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMID or VFQY?
AMID has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VFQY charges 0.13%. VFQY is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMID or VFQY?
Over the past year AMID returned +6.87% vs +15.57% for VFQY, so VFQY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMID annualized +10.10% vs +12.30% for VFQY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMID or VFQY?
AMID has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VFQY. Worst drawdown: AMID -23.1% vs VFQY -20.7%.
Should I hold both AMID and VFQY?
AMID and VFQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMID and VFQY?
30.4% of AMID's money is in holdings VFQY also owns. 6.3% of VFQY's is in holdings AMID also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AMID and 469 in VFQY.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMID or VFQY?
AMID yields 0.33% while VFQY yields 1.04%, so VFQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VFQY better than AMID?
VFQY has a lower expense ratio. VFQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VFQY is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.