AMOM vs ARKQ
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Which is better, AMOM or ARKQ?
Each has led over a different period.
AMOM led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKQ over 3Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | ARKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Tie | 0.75%Tie |
| AUM | $23M | $1.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 102 | 39 |
| YTD Return | +19.96%Best | -2.20% |
| 1Y Return | +21.68%Best | -3.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.92% | +30.76%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.23%Best | +7.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6%Best | 30.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7%Best | -59.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,026Best | $14,564 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 58.9% |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Ark Invest |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 30, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).
AMOM vs ARKQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs ARKQ Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% while ARKQ returned -3.80%. Year to date, AMOM is up 19.96% versus a loss of 2.20% for ARKQ.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.92% per year against +30.76% for ARKQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.23% and +7.81% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, ARKQ has the edge at +19.44% annualized vs +16.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.9% compared with 21.6% for AMOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -59.9% for ARKQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while ARKQ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 0.25% for ARKQ.
Holdings Overlap
21.9% of AMOM's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns. 25.8% of ARKQ's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
ARKQ and AMOM share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 36 in ARKQ, against full books of 102 and 39.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for ARKQ that do not appear in our book for AMOM (65.0% of the fund), and 44 for AMOM that do not appear in ARKQ (77.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
25.8% of ARKQ is already inside AMOM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or ARKQ?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ARKQ charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, AMOM or ARKQ?
Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% vs -3.80% for ARKQ, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +16.76% vs +19.44% for ARKQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or ARKQ?
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.9% annualized versus 21.6% for AMOM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs ARKQ -59.9%.
Should I hold both AMOM and ARKQ?
AMOM and ARKQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and ARKQ?
25.8% of ARKQ's money is in holdings AMOM also owns. 25.8% of ARKQ's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 36 in ARKQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or ARKQ?
AMOM yields 0.00% while ARKQ yields 0.25%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ARKQ better than AMOM?
AMOM led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKQ over 3Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.