AMOM vs ARKW
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs ARK Next Generation Technology ETF
Which is better, AMOM or ARKW?
Each has led over a different period.
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKW over 3Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | ARKW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.76% |
| AUM | $23M | $2.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.47% |
| Holdings | 102 | 88 |
| YTD Return | +19.96%Best | +7.08% |
| 1Y Return | +21.68%Best | -5.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.92% | +44.31%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.23%Best | +2.38% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6%Best | 39.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7%Best | -80.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,026Best | $11,248 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 44.6% |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Ark Invest |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 30, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).
AMOM vs ARKW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs ARKW Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% while ARKW returned -5.81%. Year to date, AMOM is up 19.96% versus a gain of 7.08% for ARKW.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.92% per year against +44.31% for ARKW; over five years the annualized figures are +11.23% and +2.38% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, ARKW has the edge at +17.62% annualized vs +16.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 21.6% for AMOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -80.0% for ARKW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while ARKW charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $76 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 1.47% for ARKW.
Holdings Overlap
25.2% of AMOM's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 22.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
AMOM and ARKW share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 40 in ARKW, against full books of 102 and 88.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for ARKW that do not appear in our book for AMOM (67.5% of the fund), and 43 for AMOM that do not appear in ARKW (74.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in ARKW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.55% | 4.34% | 4.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.89% | 2.59% | 1.30% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 1.77% | 4.47% | 2.70% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.12% | 3.11% | 0.01% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.12% | 2.73% | 0.39% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.82% | 2.27% | 0.55% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 1.90% | 2.50% | 0.60% |
25.2% of AMOM is already inside ARKW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or ARKW?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ARKW charges 0.76%. AMOM is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or ARKW?
Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% vs -5.81% for ARKW, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +16.76% vs +17.62% for ARKW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or ARKW?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 21.6% for AMOM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs ARKW -80.0%.
Should I hold both AMOM and ARKW?
AMOM and ARKW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and ARKW?
25.2% of AMOM's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 22.0% of ARKW's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 40 in ARKW.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or ARKW?
AMOM yields 0.00% while ARKW yields 1.47%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ARKW better than AMOM?
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKW over 3Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.