AMOM vs THRO
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Which is better, AMOM or THRO?
Each has led over a different period.
THRO has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and 3Y, THRO over the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | THRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 102 | 251 |
| YTD Return | +19.96%Best | +14.55% |
| 1Y Return | +21.68%Best | +18.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.92%Best | +23.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.23% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -26.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,518 | $18,140Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 43.5% |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Dec 14, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
AMOM vs THRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs THRO Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% while THRO returned +18.23%. Year to date, AMOM is up 19.96% versus a gain of 14.55% for THRO.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.92% per year against +23.72% for THRO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 17.4% for THRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for AMOM and -26.5% for THRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 0.30% for THRO.
Holdings Overlap
74.4% of AMOM's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 28.8% of THRO's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
Most of AMOM is already inside THRO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 247 in THRO, against full books of 102 and 251.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 129 positions for THRO that do not appear in our book for AMOM (70.0% of the fund), and 17 for AMOM that do not appear in THRO (25.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in THRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.55% | 8.58% | 0.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.89% | 2.11% | 1.78% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.23% | 2.61% | 0.62% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.23% | 2.29% | 0.94% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.12% | 1.99% | 1.13% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.29% | 1.56% | 1.73% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.12% | 0.75% | 2.37% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 2.93% | 0.69% | 2.24% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 1.88% | 1.47% | 0.41% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Ho-a | 2.82% | 0.30% | 2.52% |
74.4% of AMOM is already inside THRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or THRO?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while THRO charges 0.57%. THRO is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or THRO?
Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% vs +18.23% for THRO, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or THRO?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 17.4% for THRO. Worst drawdown: AMOM -36.0% vs THRO -26.5%.
Should I hold both AMOM and THRO?
AMOM and THRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and THRO?
74.4% of AMOM's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 28.8% of THRO's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 247 in THRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or THRO?
AMOM yields 0.00% while THRO yields 0.30%, so THRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THRO better than AMOM?
THRO has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and 3Y, THRO over the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.