AMYY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AMYY or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMYY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMYY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 120.81% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +4.79% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.84%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.4% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $12,976Best | $11,787 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
AMYY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
AMYY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMYY returned +18.84% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, AMYY is up 4.79% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.4% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for AMYY and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMYY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMYY currently yields 120.81% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMYY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMYY or VTI?
AMYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMYY or VTI?
Over the past year AMYY returned +18.84% vs +16.63% for VTI, so AMYY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AMYY annualized +26.72% vs +16.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMYY or VTI?
AMYY has been the more volatile fund at 26.4% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMYY -16.9% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both AMYY and VTI?
AMYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMYY or VTI?
AMYY yields 120.81% while VTI yields 1.06%, so AMYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AMYY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMYY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.