AMZD vs DUST
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF vs Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF
Which is better, AMZD or DUST?
AMZD has been ahead.
DUST has a lower expense ratio. AMZD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZD | DUST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.93%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.73% | 5.07% |
| Holdings | 12 | 14 |
| YTD Return | -15.10%Best | -39.87% |
| 1Y Return | -19.59%Best | -55.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -22.21%Best | -66.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -51.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.6%Best | 70.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -74.8%Best | -98.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $4,202Best | $202 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | Dec 8, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).
AMZD vs DUST growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
AMZD vs DUST Performance
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF (DUST) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year AMZD returned -19.59% while DUST returned -55.63%. Year to date, AMZD is down 15.10% versus a loss of 39.87% for DUST.
Over three years, AMZD compounded at -22.21% per year against -66.09% for DUST. Across the full 4-year window we track, AMZD has the edge at -19.06% annualized vs -61.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.2% compared with 28.6% for AMZD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -98.9% for DUST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZD charges 1.02% per year while DUST charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $93 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 2.73% against 5.07% for DUST.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in AMZD and 2 in DUST, totalling 82.1% and 102.4% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in AMZD and 2 in DUST, against full books of 12 and 14.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZD and DUST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZD or DUST?
AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while DUST charges 0.93%. DUST is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZD or DUST?
Over the past year AMZD returned -19.59% vs -55.63% for DUST, so AMZD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -19.06% vs -61.38% for DUST. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZD or DUST?
DUST has been the more volatile fund at 70.2% annualized versus 28.6% for AMZD. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs DUST -98.9%.
Should I hold both AMZD and DUST?
AMZD and DUST have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or DUST?
AMZD yields 2.73% while DUST yields 5.07%, so DUST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DUST better than AMZD?
DUST has a lower expense ratio. AMZD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.