AMZD vs TSLQ

AMZD vs TSLQ

Which is better, AMZD or TSLQ?

Each has led over a different period.

AMZD has a lower expense ratio. AMZD led over 3Y and the full window, TSLQ over 1Y.

Lower Fees: AMZDHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAMZDTSLQ
Expense Ratio1.02%Best1.15%
AUM$11M$92M
Dividend Yield2.73%9.89%
Holdings1212
YTD Return-15.10%-6.17%Best
1Y Return-19.59%-19.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-22.21%Best-65.37%
Volatility (annualized)28.6%Best88.4%
Max Drawdown-74.8%Best-98.7%
$10,000 over 4.1 years$4,202Best$346
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustTradr ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionSep 7, 2022Jul 13, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).

AMZD vs TSLQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

Compare AMZD against instead:AMZD vs SPYAMZD vs QQQAMZD vs VOOAMZD vs VTITSLQ against:TSLQ vs VXUS

AMZD vs TSLQ Performance

Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year AMZD returned -19.59% while TSLQ returned -19.23%. Year to date, AMZD is down 15.10% versus a loss of 6.17% for TSLQ.

Over three years, AMZD compounded at -22.21% per year against -65.37% for TSLQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, AMZD has the edge at -19.06% annualized vs -55.99%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.4% compared with 28.6% for AMZD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -98.7% for TSLQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AMZD charges 1.02% per year while TSLQ charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $115 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 2.73% against 9.89% for TSLQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in AMZD and 1 in TSLQ, totalling 82.1% and 5.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in AMZD and 1 in TSLQ, against full books of 12 and 12.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AMZD and TSLQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AMZDTSLQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AMZD or TSLQ?

AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while TSLQ charges 1.15%. AMZD is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AMZD or TSLQ?

Over the past year AMZD returned -19.59% vs -19.23% for TSLQ, so TSLQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -19.06% vs -55.99% for TSLQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AMZD or TSLQ?

TSLQ has been the more volatile fund at 88.4% annualized versus 28.6% for AMZD. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs TSLQ -98.7%.

Should I hold both AMZD and TSLQ?

AMZD and TSLQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or TSLQ?

AMZD yields 2.73% while TSLQ yields 9.89%, so TSLQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLQ better than AMZD?

AMZD has a lower expense ratio. AMZD led over 3Y and the full window, TSLQ over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.