AMZP vs BFEB
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF vs Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February
Which is better, AMZP or BFEB?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZP | BFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $208M |
| Dividend Yield | 19.83% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 21 | 18 |
| YTD Return | -4.01% | +11.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.36% | +15.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 7.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -13.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,979 | $14,292Best |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Feb 3, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
AMZP vs BFEB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
AMZP vs BFEB Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) is an ETF from Kurv and Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% while BFEB returned +15.60%. Year to date, AMZP is down 4.01% versus a gain of 11.67% for BFEB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 7.4% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AMZP and -13.8% for BFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZP charges 0.99% per year while BFEB charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $79 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZP currently yields 19.83% against 0.00% for BFEB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZP and BFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZP or BFEB?
AMZP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while BFEB charges 0.79%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZP or BFEB?
Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% vs +15.60% for BFEB, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZP or BFEB?
AMZP has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 7.4% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: AMZP -27.4% vs BFEB -13.8%.
Should I hold both AMZP and BFEB?
AMZP and BFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZP or BFEB?
AMZP yields 19.83% while BFEB yields 0.00%, so AMZP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BFEB better than AMZP?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.