AMZP vs CAOS
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Which is better, AMZP or CAOS?
Each has led over a different period.
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over the full window, CAOS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZP | CAOS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.63%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $705M |
| Dividend Yield | 19.83% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 21 | 12 |
| YTD Return | -4.01% | +1.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.36% | +1.45%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 1.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -3.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,979Best | $10,939 |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Alpha Architect |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
AMZP vs CAOS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
AMZP vs CAOS Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) is an ETF from Kurv and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is an ETF from Alpha Architect. Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% while CAOS returned +1.45%. Year to date, AMZP is down 4.01% versus a gain of 1.68% for CAOS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 1.6% for CAOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AMZP and -3.6% for CAOS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZP charges 0.99% per year while CAOS charges 0.63%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $63 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZP currently yields 19.83% against 0.00% for CAOS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AMZP and 1 in CAOS, totalling 0.6% and 0.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AMZP and 1 in CAOS, against full books of 21 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZP and CAOS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZP or CAOS?
AMZP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while CAOS charges 0.63%. CAOS is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZP or CAOS?
Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% vs +1.45% for CAOS, so CAOS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZP or CAOS?
AMZP has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 1.6% for CAOS. Worst drawdown: AMZP -27.4% vs CAOS -3.6%.
Should I hold both AMZP and CAOS?
AMZP and CAOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZP or CAOS?
AMZP yields 19.83% while CAOS yields 0.00%, so AMZP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CAOS better than AMZP?
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over the full window, CAOS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.