AMZP vs ETHU
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF vs 2x Ether ETF
Which is better, AMZP or ETHU?
AMZP has been ahead.
AMZP has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZP | ETHU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99%Best | 2.97% |
| AUM | $18M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 19.83% | 1.52% |
| Holdings | 21 | 4 |
| YTD Return | -3.59%Best | -58.60% |
| 1Y Return | +0.51%Best | -78.27% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6%Best | 152.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4%Best | -96.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $12,355Best | $793 |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Volatility Shares, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Jun 4, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.4 years).
AMZP vs ETHU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
AMZP vs ETHU Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) is an ETF from Kurv and 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC. Over the past year AMZP returned +0.51% while ETHU returned -78.27%. Year to date, AMZP is down 3.59% versus a loss of 58.60% for ETHU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 152.9% compared with 30.6% for AMZP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AMZP and -96.5% for ETHU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZP charges 0.99% per year while ETHU charges 2.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $297 annually, a gap of $198 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZP currently yields 19.83% against 1.52% for ETHU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZP and ETHU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZP or ETHU?
AMZP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while ETHU charges 2.97%. AMZP is the cheaper option, by $198 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZP or ETHU?
Over the past year AMZP returned +0.51% vs -78.27% for ETHU, so AMZP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMZP annualized +9.21% vs -65.21% for ETHU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZP or ETHU?
ETHU has been the more volatile fund at 152.9% annualized versus 30.6% for AMZP. Worst drawdown: AMZP -27.4% vs ETHU -96.5%.
Should I hold both AMZP and ETHU?
AMZP and ETHU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZP or ETHU?
AMZP yields 19.83% while ETHU yields 1.52%, so AMZP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ETHU better than AMZP?
AMZP has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.