AMZP vs RSST
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF vs Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, AMZP or RSST?
RSST has been ahead.
RSST led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZP | RSST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99%Tie | 0.99%Tie |
| AUM | $18M | $602M |
| Dividend Yield | 19.83% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 21 | 36 |
| YTD Return | -4.01% | +25.38%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.36% | +32.18%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4%Best | -30.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,979 | $17,103Best |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Sep 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
AMZP vs RSST growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
AMZP vs RSST Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) is an ETF from Kurv and Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% while RSST returned +32.18%. Year to date, AMZP is down 4.01% versus a gain of 25.38% for RSST.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 17.4% for RSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AMZP and -30.8% for RSST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZP charges 0.99% per year while RSST charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $99 annually. On income, AMZP currently yields 19.83% against 0.23% for RSST.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AMZP and 2 in RSST, totalling 0.6% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AMZP and 2 in RSST, against full books of 21 and 36.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZP and RSST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZP or RSST?
AMZP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while RSST charges 0.99%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, AMZP or RSST?
Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% vs +32.18% for RSST, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZP or RSST?
AMZP has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 17.4% for RSST. Worst drawdown: AMZP -27.4% vs RSST -30.8%.
Should I hold both AMZP and RSST?
AMZP and RSST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZP or RSST?
AMZP yields 19.83% while RSST yields 0.23%, so AMZP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSST better than AMZP?
RSST led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.