AMZP vs ZALT
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Which is better, AMZP or ZALT?
Each has led over a different period.
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over the full window, ZALT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZP | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $794M |
| Dividend Yield | 19.83% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 21 | 18 |
| YTD Return | -4.01% | +6.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.36% | +9.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 3.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,979Best | $12,852 |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
AMZP vs ZALT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
AMZP vs ZALT Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) is an ETF from Kurv and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, AMZP is down 4.01% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 3.7% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AMZP and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZP charges 0.99% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $69 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZP currently yields 19.83% against 0.00% for ZALT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZP and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZP or ZALT?
AMZP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZP or ZALT?
Over the past year AMZP returned -0.36% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so ZALT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZP or ZALT?
AMZP has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 3.7% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: AMZP -27.4% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both AMZP and ZALT?
AMZP and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZP or ZALT?
AMZP yields 19.83% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so AMZP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZALT better than AMZP?
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. AMZP led over the full window, ZALT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.