ANTW vs ARKQ

ANTW vs ARKQ

Which is better, ANTW or ARKQ?

ANTW costs less.

ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.

Lower Fees: ANTWLess Concentrated: ANTW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricANTWARKQ
Expense Ratio0.59%Best0.75%
AUM$24M$1.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.25%
Holdings2539
YTD Return-8.09%-2.20%Best
1Y Return--3.80%
3Y Return (annualized)-+30.76%
5Y Return (annualized)-+7.81%
Top 10 Weight55.5%Best58.9%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsArk Invest
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 12, 2026Sep 30, 2014

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ANTW vs ARKQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ANTW against instead:ANTW vs SPYANTW vs QQQANTW vs VOOANTW vs VTIARKQ against:ARKQ vs VXUS

ANTW vs ARKQ Performance

Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a loss of 2.20% for ARKQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ANTW charges 0.59% per year while ARKQ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $75 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.25% for ARKQ.

Holdings Overlap

ANTW already in ARKQ24.4%
ARKQ already in ANTW28.1%

24.4% of ANTW's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns. 28.1% of ARKQ's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.

ARKQ and ANTW share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 36 in ARKQ, against full books of 25 and 39.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 25 positions for ARKQ that do not appear in our book for ANTW (66.6% of the fund), and 18 for ANTW that do not appear in ARKQ (71.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ANTWWeight in ARKQDifference
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies3.89%8.28%4.39%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.80%3.45%2.35%
NVDANvidia Corp3.03%5.97%2.94%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.70%4.29%0.59%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.30%2.19%3.11%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.65%3.89%1.24%

28.1% of ARKQ is already inside ANTW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ANTWARKQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ANTW or ARKQ?

ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while ARKQ charges 0.75%. ANTW is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and ARKQ?

28.1% of ARKQ's money is in holdings ANTW also owns. 28.1% of ARKQ's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 36 in ARKQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or ARKQ?

ANTW yields 0.00% while ARKQ yields 0.25%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ARKQ better than ANTW?

ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.