ANTW vs ARKW

ANTW vs ARKW

Which is better, ANTW or ARKW?

ANTW costs less.

ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.

Lower Fees: ANTWLess Concentrated: ARKW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricANTWARKW
Expense Ratio0.59%Best0.76%
AUM$24M$2.0B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.47%
Holdings2588
YTD Return-8.09%+7.08%Best
1Y Return--5.81%
3Y Return (annualized)-+44.31%
5Y Return (annualized)-+2.38%
Top 10 Weight55.5%44.6%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsArk Invest
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 12, 2026Sep 30, 2014

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ANTW vs ARKW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ANTW against instead:ANTW vs SPYANTW vs QQQANTW vs VOOANTW vs VTIARKW against:ARKW vs VXUS

ANTW vs ARKW Performance

Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a gain of 7.08% for ARKW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ANTW charges 0.59% per year while ARKW charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $76 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 1.47% for ARKW.

Holdings Overlap

ANTW already in ARKW24.4%
ARKW already in ANTW20.4%

24.4% of ANTW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 20.4% of ARKW's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.

ANTW and ARKW share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 40 in ARKW, against full books of 25 and 88.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 31 positions for ARKW that do not appear in our book for ANTW (71.4% of the fund), and 18 for ANTW that do not appear in ARKW (71.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ANTWWeight in ARKWDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.80%3.62%2.18%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies3.89%4.50%0.61%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.30%2.59%2.71%
NVDANvidia Corp3.03%4.34%1.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.70%3.11%0.59%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.65%2.26%0.39%

24.4% of ANTW is already inside ARKW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ANTWARKW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ANTW or ARKW?

ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while ARKW charges 0.76%. ANTW is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and ARKW?

24.4% of ANTW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 20.4% of ARKW's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 40 in ARKW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or ARKW?

ANTW yields 0.00% while ARKW yields 1.47%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ARKW better than ANTW?

ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.