ANTW vs GQGU
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs GQG US Equity ETF
Which is better, ANTW or GQGU?
GQGU costs less.
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANTW | GQGU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $584M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 25 | 77 |
| YTD Return | -8.09% | +5.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +3.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | GQG Partners LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Jul 31, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ANTW vs GQGU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ANTW vs GQGU Performance
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a gain of 5.40% for GQGU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANTW charges 0.59% per year while GQGU charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.95% for GQGU.
Holdings Overlap
30.2% of ANTW's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 33.4% of GQGU's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 38 in GQGU, against full books of 25 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for GQGU that do not appear in our book for ANTW (63.5% of the fund), and 16 for ANTW that do not appear in GQGU (63.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
33.4% of GQGU is already inside ANTW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANTW or GQGU?
ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while GQGU charges 0.49%. GQGU is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and GQGU?
33.4% of GQGU's money is in holdings ANTW also owns. 33.4% of GQGU's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 38 in GQGU.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or GQGU?
ANTW yields 0.00% while GQGU yields 0.95%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GQGU better than ANTW?
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.