ANTW vs LRGC
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, ANTW or LRGC?
LRGC costs less.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANTW | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 25 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -8.09% | +10.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5% | 44.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ANTW vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ANTW vs LRGC Performance
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANTW charges 0.59% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $39 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
28.4% of ANTW's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 26.1% of LRGC's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.
ANTW and LRGC share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 25 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 59 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for ANTW (71.2% of the fund), and 17 for ANTW that do not appear in LRGC (67.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ANTW | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.13% | 6.66% | 1.53% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.03% | 8.71% | 5.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.80% | 4.69% | 1.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.30% | 2.93% | 2.37% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.48% | 0.76% | 3.72% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.65% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 2.01% | 1.05% | 0.96% |
28.4% of ANTW is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANTW or LRGC?
ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and LRGC?
28.4% of ANTW's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 26.1% of LRGC's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or LRGC?
ANTW yields 0.00% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than ANTW?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.