ANTW vs PCLG
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, ANTW or PCLG?
PCLG costs less.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANTW | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 25 | 27 |
| YTD Return | -8.09% | -5.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -8.10% |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ANTW vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ANTW vs PCLG Performance
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANTW charges 0.59% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
21.9% of ANTW's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 31.2% of PCLG's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
5 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 25 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for ANTW (61.6% of the fund), and 19 for ANTW that do not appear in PCLG (74.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
31.2% of PCLG is already inside ANTW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANTW or PCLG?
ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and PCLG?
31.2% of PCLG's money is in holdings ANTW also owns. 31.2% of PCLG's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or PCLG?
ANTW yields 0.00% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than ANTW?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.