ANTW vs RJCA
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, ANTW or RJCA?
ANTW costs less.
ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANTW | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $24M | $617M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 25 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -8.09% | +4.02%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.5%Best | 57.0% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ANTW vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ANTW vs RJCA Performance
Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, ANTW is down 8.09% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANTW charges 0.59% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $61 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
43.7% of ANTW's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 43.6% of RJCA's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 25 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 60 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for ANTW (55.4% of the fund), and 13 for ANTW that do not appear in RJCA (49.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ANTW | Weight in RJCA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.03% | 15.22% | 12.19% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.13% | 7.85% | 2.72% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.22% | 4.73% | 2.49% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.30% | 5.18% | 0.12% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.48% | 3.87% | 0.61% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.80% | 1.94% | 3.86% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.70% | 3.06% | 0.64% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 4.16% | 0.66% | 3.50% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 2.78% | 0.54% | 2.24% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 2.07% | 0.60% | 1.47% |
43.7% of ANTW is already inside RJCA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANTW or RJCA?
ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while RJCA charges 0.61%. ANTW is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and RJCA?
43.7% of ANTW's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 43.6% of RJCA's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 71 in RJCA.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or RJCA?
ANTW yields 0.00% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so RJCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than ANTW?
ANTW has a lower expense ratio. ANTW is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.