AOCT vs GGN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2028 vs GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust
Which is better, AOCT or GGN?
Each has led over a different period.
AOCT has a lower expense ratio. AOCT led over 1Y, GGN over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOCT | GGN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.40% |
| AUM | $61M | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 6.14% |
| Holdings | 15 | 221 |
| YTD Return | +4.93%Best | +2.85% |
| 1Y Return | +6.19%Best | +5.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.5%Best | 22.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7%Best | -18.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $11,185 | $13,488Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Gabelli Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2024 | Mar 29, 2005 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
AOCT vs GGN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
AOCT vs GGN Performance
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2028 (AOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year AOCT returned +6.19% while GGN returned +5.08%. Year to date, AOCT is up 4.93% versus a gain of 2.85% for GGN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 2.5% for AOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for AOCT and -18.3% for GGN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOCT charges 0.79% per year while GGN charges 1.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $140 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOCT currently yields 0.00% against 6.14% for GGN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AOCT and 71 in GGN, totalling 97.9% and 81.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 97 days apart, AOCT as of Oct 5, 2026 and GGN as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AOCT and 71 in GGN, against full books of 15 and 221.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOCT and GGN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOCT or GGN?
AOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GGN charges 1.40%. AOCT is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOCT or GGN?
Over the past year AOCT returned +6.19% vs +5.08% for GGN, so AOCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOCT annualized +5.76% vs +16.14% for GGN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOCT or GGN?
GGN has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 2.5% for AOCT. Worst drawdown: AOCT -3.7% vs GGN -18.3%.
Should I hold both AOCT and GGN?
AOCT and GGN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOCT or GGN?
AOCT yields 0.00% while GGN yields 6.14%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GGN better than AOCT?
AOCT has a lower expense ratio. AOCT led over 1Y, GGN over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.