AOCT vs RSHO
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2028 vs Tema American Reshoring ETF
Which is better, AOCT or RSHO?
RSHO has been ahead.
RSHO has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOCT | RSHO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $61M | $302M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 15 | 25 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.8%Best | 23.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7%Best | -27.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $10,978 | $16,566Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2024 | May 11, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 118 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AOCT has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RSHO through Jun 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Jun 18, 2026 (1.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 2.8% for AOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for AOCT and -27.3% for RSHO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOCT charges 0.79% per year while RSHO charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.23% for RSHO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AOCT and 24 in RSHO, totalling 97.9% and 99.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 158 days apart, AOCT as of Oct 5, 2026 and RSHO as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AOCT and 24 in RSHO, against full books of 15 and 25.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOCT and RSHO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOCT or RSHO?
AOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RSHO charges 0.75%. RSHO is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AOCT or RSHO?
RSHO has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 2.8% for AOCT. Worst drawdown: AOCT -3.7% vs RSHO -27.3%.
Should I hold both AOCT and RSHO?
AOCT and RSHO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOCT or RSHO?
AOCT yields 0.00% while RSHO yields 0.23%, so RSHO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSHO better than AOCT?
RSHO has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.