AOD vs DINT
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Davis Select International ETF
Which is better, AOD or DINT?
AOD has been ahead.
DINT has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | DINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.66%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $269M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 1.69% |
| Holdings | 87 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +13.73%Best | -4.02% |
| 1Y Return | +19.43%Best | +2.16% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | +17.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20%Best | +8.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6%Best | 19.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.4% | -45.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,003Best | $14,707 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 52.0% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Davis ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Mar 1, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 2, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.6 years).
AOD vs DINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.6 years both funds cover.
AOD vs DINT Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Davis Select International ETF (DINT) is an ETF from Davis ETFs. Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while DINT returned +2.16%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a loss of 4.02% for DINT.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against +17.73% for DINT; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and +8.02% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, AOD has the edge at +7.84% annualized vs +5.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 18.6% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.4% for AOD and -45.1% for DINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while DINT charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $66 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 1.69% for DINT.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of AOD's money is in holdings DINT also owns. 4.5% of DINT's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
DINT and AOD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 28 in DINT, against full books of 87 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for DINT that do not appear in our book for AOD (4.7% of the fund), and 45 for AOD that do not appear in DINT (57.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in DINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 300750:SHContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. Class A | 1.07% | 4.55% | 3.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOD and DINT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or DINT?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while DINT charges 0.66%. DINT is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or DINT?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs +2.16% for DINT, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), AOD annualized +7.84% vs +5.51% for DINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or DINT?
DINT has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 18.6% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -45.4% vs DINT -45.1%.
Should I hold both AOD and DINT?
AOD and DINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and DINT?
4.5% of DINT's money is in holdings AOD also owns. 4.5% of DINT's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 28 in DINT.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or DINT?
AOD yields 12.34% while DINT yields 1.69%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DINT better than AOD?
DINT has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.