AOD vs DWLD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Davis Select Worldwide ETF
Which is better, AOD or DWLD?
Each has led over a different period.
DWLD has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, DWLD over the full window. DWLD is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | DWLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.63%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $579M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 0.94% |
| Holdings | 87 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +13.73%Best | -4.08% |
| 1Y Return | +19.43%Best | +2.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | +18.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20%Best | +9.10% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.0% | -39.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,003Best | $15,457 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2% | 26.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Davis ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jan 11, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 12, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
AOD vs DWLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
AOD vs DWLD Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) is an ETF from Davis ETFs. Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while DWLD returned +2.46%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a loss of 4.08% for DWLD.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against +18.75% for DWLD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and +9.10% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, DWLD has the edge at +9.90% annualized vs +8.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 17.8% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.0% for AOD and -39.3% for DWLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while DWLD charges 0.63%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $63 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 0.94% for DWLD.
Holdings Overlap
72.4% of AOD's money is in holdings DWLD also owns. 26.1% of DWLD's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
Most of AOD is already inside DWLD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
56 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 1,395 in DWLD, against full books of 87 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 431 positions for DWLD that do not appear in our book for AOD (44.5% of the fund), and 6 for AOD that do not appear in DWLD (6.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in DWLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.09% | 5.65% | 2.56% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.29% | 5.00% | 1.71% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.21% | 4.00% | 0.79% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.31% | 1.67% | 1.64% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.29% | 1.67% | 1.62% |
| 005935:KRSamsung Electronics Pref 0.9 | 3.80% | 0.13% | 3.67% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.69% | 0.94% | 0.75% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 1.71% | 0.73% | 0.98% |
| INGA:ASING Groep N.V. | 1.80% | 0.11% | 1.69% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.36% | 0.48% | 0.88% |
72.4% of AOD is already inside DWLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or DWLD?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while DWLD charges 0.63%. DWLD is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or DWLD?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs +2.46% for DWLD, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AOD annualized +8.56% vs +9.90% for DWLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or DWLD?
DWLD has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 17.8% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -48.0% vs DWLD -39.3%.
Should I hold both AOD and DWLD?
AOD and DWLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and DWLD?
72.4% of AOD's money is in holdings DWLD also owns. 26.1% of DWLD's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 56 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 1,395 in DWLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or DWLD?
AOD yields 12.34% while DWLD yields 0.94%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DWLD better than AOD?
DWLD has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, DWLD over the full window. DWLD is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.