AOD vs FDIF
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Disruptors ETF
Which is better, AOD or FDIF?
AOD has been ahead.
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FDIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $110M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 87 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +13.73% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.43%Best | +15.79% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | +21.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 16.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -22.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $17,823Best | $16,590 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2% | - |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Feb 13, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
AOD vs FDIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
AOD vs FDIF Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while FDIF returned +15.79%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a gain of 14.35% for FDIF.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against +21.73% for FDIF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.9% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for AOD and -22.6% for FDIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FDIF charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $50 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 0.25% for FDIF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 82 holdings in AOD and 6 in FDIF, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 6 in FDIF, against full books of 87 and 10.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for FDIF that do not appear in our book for AOD (100.0% of the fund), and 45 for AOD that do not appear in FDIF (57.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOD and FDIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FDIF?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FDIF charges 0.50%. FDIF is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or FDIF?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs +15.79% for FDIF, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or FDIF?
FDIF has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.9% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -16.7% vs FDIF -22.6%.
Should I hold both AOD and FDIF?
AOD and FDIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FDIF?
AOD yields 12.34% while FDIF yields 0.25%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIF better than AOD?
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.