AOD vs FDLS
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
Which is better, AOD or FDLS?
Each has led over a different period.
FDLS has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 3Y and the full window, FDLS over 1Y. FDLS is less concentrated, with 11.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FDLS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.66%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $259M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 87 | 203 |
| YTD Return | +13.73% | +15.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.43% | +21.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | +19.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 18.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -23.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $18,882Best | $18,093 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2% | 11.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Inspire ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Aug 23, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).
AOD vs FDLS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
AOD vs FDLS Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while FDLS returned +21.43%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a gain of 15.94% for FDLS.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against +19.89% for FDLS. Across the full 4-year window we track, AOD has the edge at +16.77% annualized vs +15.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 16.7% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for AOD and -23.3% for FDLS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FDLS charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $66 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 0.86% for FDLS.
Holdings Overlap
3.3% of AOD's money is in holdings FDLS also owns. 1.0% of FDLS's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
AOD and FDLS share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 101 in FDLS, against full books of 87 and 203.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for FDLS that do not appear in our book for AOD (86.9% of the fund), and 44 for AOD that do not appear in FDLS (54.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in FDLS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.31% | 1.02% | 2.29% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOD and FDLS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FDLS?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FDLS charges 0.66%. FDLS is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or FDLS?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs +21.43% for FDLS, so FDLS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AOD annualized +16.77% vs +15.56% for FDLS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or FDLS?
FDLS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 16.7% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -16.7% vs FDLS -23.3%.
Should I hold both AOD and FDLS?
AOD and FDLS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and FDLS?
3.3% of AOD's money is in holdings FDLS also owns. 1.0% of FDLS's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 101 in FDLS.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FDLS?
AOD yields 12.34% while FDLS yields 0.86%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDLS better than AOD?
FDLS has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 3Y and the full window, FDLS over 1Y. FDLS is less concentrated, with 11.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.