AOD vs IDX
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs VanEck Indonesia Index ETF
Which is better, AOD or IDX?
Each has led over a different period.
IDX has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IDX over the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IDX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 87 | 138 |
| YTD Return | +13.73%Best | -38.14% |
| 1Y Return | +19.43%Best | -34.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | -13.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20%Best | -11.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3%Best | 25.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.0% | -63.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,003Best | $5,515 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 50.0% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jan 15, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 20, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (17.7 years).
AOD vs IDX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.7 years both funds cover.
AOD vs IDX Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and VanEck Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while IDX returned -34.20%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a loss of 38.14% for IDX.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against -13.75% for IDX; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and -11.22% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IDX has the edge at +3.40% annualized vs +1.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 20.3% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.0% for AOD and -63.2% for IDX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IDX charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $57 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 3.23% for IDX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 82 holdings in AOD and 64 in IDX, totalling 100.0% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 64 in IDX, against full books of 87 and 138.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for IDX that do not appear in our book for AOD (0.0% of the fund), and 45 for AOD that do not appear in IDX (57.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOD and IDX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IDX?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IDX charges 0.57%. IDX is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or IDX?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs -34.20% for IDX, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), AOD annualized +1.32% vs +3.40% for IDX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or IDX?
IDX has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 20.3% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -72.0% vs IDX -63.2%.
Should I hold both AOD and IDX?
AOD and IDX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IDX?
AOD yields 12.34% while IDX yields 3.23%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IDX better than AOD?
IDX has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IDX over the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.