AOD vs MOO
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Which is better, AOD or MOO?
Each has led over a different period.
MOO has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, MOO over the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.56%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.34% | 2.20% |
| Holdings | 87 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +13.73%Best | +11.54% |
| 1Y Return | +19.43%Best | +16.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.21%Best | +4.13% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.20%Best | -0.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 20.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -87.1% | -69.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,003Best | $9,558 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 56.9% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Aug 31, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.1 years).
AOD vs MOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.1 years both funds cover.
AOD vs MOO Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% while MOO returned +16.95%. Year to date, AOD is up 13.73% versus a gain of 11.54% for MOO.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.21% per year against +4.13% for MOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.20% and -0.90% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, MOO has the edge at +5.30% annualized vs -4.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 20.9% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.1% for AOD and -69.5% for MOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while MOO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $56 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 12.34% against 2.20% for MOO.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of AOD's money is in holdings MOO also owns. 1.4% of MOO's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
MOO and AOD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 47 in MOO, against full books of 87 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for MOO that do not appear in our book for AOD (54.2% of the fund), and 45 for AOD that do not appear in MOO (57.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in MOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAIL3:BVRumo Sa | 1.34% | 1.44% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOD and MOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or MOO?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while MOO charges 0.56%. MOO is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or MOO?
Over the past year AOD returned +19.43% vs +16.95% for MOO, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), AOD annualized -4.10% vs +5.30% for MOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or MOO?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 20.9% for MOO. Worst drawdown: AOD -87.1% vs MOO -69.5%.
Should I hold both AOD and MOO?
AOD and MOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and MOO?
1.4% of MOO's money is in holdings AOD also owns. 1.4% of MOO's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 47 in MOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or MOO?
AOD yields 12.34% while MOO yields 2.20%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOO better than AOD?
MOO has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, MOO over the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.