APCB vs FIIG

APCB vs FIIG

Which is better, APCB or FIIG?

Nearly the same fund. APCB costs less.

APCB has a lower expense ratio. APCB led over 1Y, FIIG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.

Lower Fees: APCBHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPCBFIIG
Expense Ratio0.36%Best0.49%
AUM$989M$628M
Dividend Yield4.44%5.26%
Holdings3,770471
YTD Return-2.08%Best-3.13%
1Y Return-1.94%Best-3.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+3.95%+5.42%Best
Volatility (annualized)5.3%Best6.4%
Max Drawdown-5.2%Best-5.5%
$10,000 over 3.2 years$10,985$11,435Best
Fund FamilyEnvestnet Asset ManagementFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionMay 3, 2023Aug 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight, Style.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 3, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).

APCB vs FIIG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

Compare APCB against instead:APCB vs SPYAPCB vs QQQAPCB vs VOOAPCB vs VTIFIIG against:FIIG vs VXUS

APCB vs FIIG Performance

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) is an ETF from Envestnet Asset Management and First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year APCB returned -1.94% while FIIG returned -3.25%. Year to date, APCB is down 2.08% versus a loss of 3.13% for FIIG.

Over three years, APCB compounded at +3.95% per year against +5.42% for FIIG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FIIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.4% compared with 5.3% for APCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.2% for APCB and -5.5% for FIIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

APCB charges 0.36% per year while FIIG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $49 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APCB currently yields 4.44% against 5.26% for FIIG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of APCB and FIIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

APCBFIIG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APCB or FIIG?

APCB has an expense ratio of 0.36% while FIIG charges 0.49%. APCB is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, APCB or FIIG?

Over the past year APCB returned -1.94% vs -3.25% for FIIG, so APCB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, APCB or FIIG?

FIIG has been the more volatile fund at 6.4% annualized versus 5.3% for APCB. Worst drawdown: APCB -5.2% vs FIIG -5.5%.

Should I hold both APCB and FIIG?

APCB and FIIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, APCB or FIIG?

APCB yields 4.44% while FIIG yields 5.26%, so FIIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FIIG better than APCB?

APCB has a lower expense ratio. APCB led over 1Y, FIIG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.