APRH vs WGMI

APRH vs WGMI

Which is better, APRH or WGMI?

Each has led over a different period.

WGMI has a lower expense ratio. APRH led over 1Y, WGMI over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: WGMIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPRHWGMI
Expense Ratio0.79%0.75%Best
AUM$25M$194M
Dividend Yield6.43%0.00%
Holdings2457
YTD Return+0.56%Best-19.60%
1Y Return+0.19%Best-47.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.28%+55.28%Best
Volatility (annualized)3.2%Best82.4%
Max Drawdown-5.9%Best-62.8%
$10,000 over 3.5 years$11,878$36,401Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustValkyrie Funds
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 3, 2023Feb 7, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).

APRH vs WGMI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare APRH against instead:APRH vs SPYAPRH vs QQQAPRH vs VOOAPRH vs VTIWGMI against:WGMI vs VXUS

APRH vs WGMI Performance

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF (WGMI) is an ETF from Valkyrie Funds. Over the past year APRH returned +0.19% while WGMI returned -47.00%. Year to date, APRH is up 0.56% versus a loss of 19.60% for WGMI.

Over three years, APRH compounded at +4.28% per year against +55.28% for WGMI. Across the full 4-year window we track, WGMI has the edge at +44.65% annualized vs +5.04%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

WGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 82.4% compared with 3.2% for APRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for APRH and -62.8% for WGMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

APRH charges 0.79% per year while WGMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRH currently yields 6.43% against 0.00% for WGMI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of APRH and WGMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

APRHWGMI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APRH or WGMI?

APRH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while WGMI charges 0.75%. WGMI is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, APRH or WGMI?

Over the past year APRH returned +0.19% vs -47.00% for WGMI, so APRH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), APRH annualized +5.04% vs +44.65% for WGMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, APRH or WGMI?

WGMI has been the more volatile fund at 82.4% annualized versus 3.2% for APRH. Worst drawdown: APRH -5.9% vs WGMI -62.8%.

Should I hold both APRH and WGMI?

APRH and WGMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, APRH or WGMI?

APRH yields 6.43% while WGMI yields 0.00%, so APRH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WGMI better than APRH?

WGMI has a lower expense ratio. APRH led over 1Y, WGMI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.