APRQ vs MRCP
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March
Which is better, APRQ or MRCP?
MRCP has been ahead.
MRCP has a lower expense ratio. MRCP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APRQ | MRCP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 5 | 16 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.0%Best | 6.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7%Best | -4.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $10,278 | $11,131Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 561 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. APRQ has data through Apr 1, 2025 and MRCP through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 1, 2024 to Apr 1, 2025 (1.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MRCP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.4% compared with 2.0% for APRQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for APRQ and -4.8% for MRCP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APRQ charges 0.79% per year while MRCP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $50 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRQ currently yields 5.07% against 0.00% for MRCP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of APRQ and MRCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APRQ or MRCP?
APRQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MRCP charges 0.50%. MRCP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, APRQ or MRCP?
MRCP has been the more volatile fund at 6.4% annualized versus 2.0% for APRQ. Worst drawdown: APRQ -1.7% vs MRCP -4.8%.
Should I hold both APRQ and MRCP?
APRQ and MRCP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, APRQ or MRCP?
APRQ yields 5.07% while MRCP yields 0.00%, so APRQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MRCP better than APRQ?
MRCP has a lower expense ratio. MRCP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.