APRQ vs ZMAR

APRQ vs ZMAR

Which is better, APRQ or ZMAR?

ZMAR has been ahead.

ZMAR led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns (1Y): ZMAR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPRQZMAR
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$18M$112M
Dividend Yield5.07%0.00%
Holdings521
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 3, 2023Mar 3, 2025

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 561 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. APRQ has data through Apr 1, 2025 and ZMAR through Oct 14, 2026.

Compare APRQ against instead:APRQ vs SPYAPRQ vs QQQAPRQ vs VOOAPRQ vs VTIZMAR against:ZMAR vs VXUS

Fees and Cost Over Time

APRQ charges 0.79% per year while ZMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, APRQ currently yields 5.07% against 0.00% for ZMAR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of APRQ and ZMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

APRQZMAR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APRQ or ZMAR?

APRQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZMAR charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which pays a higher dividend, APRQ or ZMAR?

APRQ yields 5.07% while ZMAR yields 0.00%, so APRQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZMAR better than APRQ?

ZMAR led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.