AQLG vs BDVG

AQLG vs BDVG

Which is better, AQLG or BDVG?

BDVG costs less.

BDVG has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.4%.

Lower Fees: BDVGLess Concentrated: AQLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAQLGBDVG
Expense Ratio0.65%0.55%Best
AUM$78M-
Dividend Yield0.00%1.38%
Holdings13285
YTD Return+4.25%+17.47%Best
1Y Return-+20.24%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.49%
Top 10 Weight35.5%Best43.4%
Fund FamilyHighland Capital ManagementiMGP Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2026Jun 29, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AQLG vs BDVG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AQLG against instead:AQLG vs SPYAQLG vs QQQAQLG vs VOOAQLG vs VTIBDVG against:BDVG vs VXUS

AQLG vs BDVG Performance

HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is an ETF from iMGP Funds. Year to date, AQLG is up 4.25% versus a gain of 17.47% for BDVG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AQLG charges 0.65% per year while BDVG charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $55 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 1.38% for BDVG.

Holdings Overlap

AQLG already in BDVG21.9%
BDVG already in AQLG30.7%

21.9% of AQLG's money is in holdings BDVG also owns. 30.7% of BDVG's money is in holdings AQLG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 41 in BDVG, against full books of 132 and 85.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 26 positions for BDVG that do not appear in our book for AQLG (63.5% of the fund), and 111 for AQLG that do not appear in BDVG (75.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AQLGWeight in BDVGDifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.44%4.56%0.88%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.72%4.25%1.53%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.09%3.77%0.68%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.94%4.11%2.17%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials2.80%3.08%0.28%
KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de3.20%2.20%1.00%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.1.10%1.58%0.48%
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.19%2.08%1.89%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv0.66%1.45%0.79%
LOWLowes Cos., Inc.0.48%1.42%0.94%

30.7% of BDVG is already inside AQLG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AQLGBDVG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AQLG or BDVG?

AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while BDVG charges 0.55%. BDVG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and BDVG?

30.7% of BDVG's money is in holdings AQLG also owns. 30.7% of BDVG's is in holdings AQLG also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 41 in BDVG.

Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or BDVG?

AQLG yields 0.00% while BDVG yields 1.38%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BDVG better than AQLG?

BDVG has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.