AQLG vs FFLG

AQLG vs FFLG

Which is better, AQLG or FFLG?

FFLG costs less.

FFLG has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.

Lower Fees: FFLGLess Concentrated: AQLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAQLGFFLG
Expense Ratio0.65%0.38%Best
AUM$78M$635M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.07%
Holdings132202
YTD Return+4.25%+11.11%Best
1Y Return-+14.85%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.80%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.81%
Top 10 Weight35.5%Best57.3%
Fund FamilyHighland Capital ManagementFidelity Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2026Feb 2, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AQLG vs FFLG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AQLG against instead:AQLG vs SPYAQLG vs QQQAQLG vs VOOAQLG vs VTIFFLG against:FFLG vs VXUS

AQLG vs FFLG Performance

HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Year to date, AQLG is up 4.25% versus a gain of 11.11% for FFLG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AQLG charges 0.65% per year while FFLG charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $38 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 0.07% for FFLG.

Holdings Overlap

AQLG already in FFLG41.9%
FFLG already in AQLG70.8%

41.9% of AQLG's money is in holdings FFLG also owns. 70.8% of FFLG's money is in holdings AQLG also owns.

Most of FFLG is already inside AQLG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

37 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 101 in FFLG, against full books of 132 and 202.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 50 positions for FFLG that do not appear in our book for AQLG (22.6% of the fund), and 86 for AQLG that do not appear in FFLG (55.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AQLGWeight in FFLGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp3.11%17.18%14.07%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.69%11.36%6.67%
AAPLApple, Inc5.44%7.13%1.69%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.09%4.21%1.12%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.86%3.50%0.64%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.00%2.64%0.36%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.66%2.88%0.22%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.08%3.05%1.97%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc3.03%0.42%2.61%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.0.15%3.11%2.96%

70.8% of FFLG is already inside AQLG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AQLGFFLG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AQLG or FFLG?

AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while FFLG charges 0.38%. FFLG is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and FFLG?

70.8% of FFLG's money is in holdings AQLG also owns. 70.8% of FFLG's is in holdings AQLG also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 101 in FFLG.

Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or FFLG?

AQLG yields 0.00% while FFLG yields 0.07%, so FFLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FFLG better than AQLG?

FFLG has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.