AQLG vs GSGO

AQLG vs GSGO

Which is better, AQLG or GSGO?

GSGO costs less.

GSGO has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.

Lower Fees: GSGOLess Concentrated: AQLG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAQLGGSGO
Expense Ratio0.65%0.45%Best
AUM$78M$192M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings13254
YTD Return+4.25%+11.08%Best
1Y Return-+12.54%
Top 10 Weight35.5%Best53.5%
Fund FamilyHighland Capital ManagementGoldman Sachs Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2026May 24, 1999

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AQLG vs GSGO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AQLG against instead:AQLG vs SPYAQLG vs QQQAQLG vs VOOAQLG vs VTIGSGO against:GSGO vs VXUS

AQLG vs GSGO Performance

HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Year to date, AQLG is up 4.25% versus a gain of 11.08% for GSGO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AQLG charges 0.65% per year while GSGO charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $45 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GSGO.

Holdings Overlap

AQLG already in GSGO37.2%
GSGO already in AQLG75.8%

37.2% of AQLG's money is in holdings GSGO also owns. 75.8% of GSGO's money is in holdings AQLG also owns.

Most of GSGO is already inside AQLG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

28 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 53 in GSGO, against full books of 132 and 54.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 22 positions for GSGO that do not appear in our book for AQLG (20.3% of the fund), and 95 for AQLG that do not appear in GSGO (60.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AQLGWeight in GSGODifference
NVDANvidia Corp3.11%12.73%9.62%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.69%8.85%4.16%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.09%7.03%3.94%
AAPLApple, Inc5.44%2.16%3.28%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.86%4.30%1.44%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.08%5.19%4.11%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.00%2.56%0.44%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C1.70%3.20%1.50%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc0.09%4.53%4.44%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.66%1.02%1.64%

75.8% of GSGO is already inside AQLG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AQLGGSGO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AQLG or GSGO?

AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while GSGO charges 0.45%. GSGO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AQLG and GSGO?

75.8% of GSGO's money is in holdings AQLG also owns. 75.8% of GSGO's is in holdings AQLG also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 53 in GSGO.

Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or GSGO?

AQLG yields 0.00% while GSGO yields 0.00%, so GSGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GSGO better than AQLG?

GSGO has a lower expense ratio. AQLG is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.