AQLG vs SAWG
HCM Large Cap Growth ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, AQLG or SAWG?
SAWG costs less.
SAWG has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AQLG | SAWG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $78M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 132 | 45 |
| YTD Return | +4.25% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.42% |
| Fund Family | Highland Capital Management | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2026 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AQLG vs SAWG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AQLG vs SAWG Performance
HCM Large Cap Growth ETF (AQLG) is an ETF from Highland Capital Management and AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Year to date, AQLG is up 4.25% versus a gain of 12.08% for SAWG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AQLG charges 0.65% per year while SAWG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $49 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AQLG currently yields 0.00% against 0.25% for SAWG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 129 holdings in AQLG and 1 in SAWG, totalling 99.5% and 0.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in AQLG and 1 in SAWG, against full books of 132 and 45.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AQLG and SAWG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AQLG or SAWG?
AQLG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SAWG charges 0.49%. SAWG is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AQLG or SAWG?
AQLG yields 0.00% while SAWG yields 0.25%, so SAWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAWG better than AQLG?
SAWG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.