ARKQ vs BCTK

ARKQ vs BCTK

Which is better, ARKQ or BCTK?

BCTK has been ahead.

BCTK led over 1Y. BCTK is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns (1Y): BCTKLess Concentrated: BCTK

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKQBCTK
Expense Ratio0.75%Tie0.75%Tie
AUM$1.9B-
Dividend Yield0.25%0.16%
Holdings3940
YTD Return-2.20%+17.64%Best
1Y Return-3.80%-
3Y Return (annualized)+30.76%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.81%-
Top 10 Weight58.9%57.9%Best
Fund FamilyArk InvestBaron Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 30, 2014Dec 12, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ARKQ vs BCTK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ARKQ against instead:ARKQ vs SPYARKQ vs QQQARKQ vs VOOARKQ vs VTIBCTK against:BCTK vs VXUS

ARKQ vs BCTK Performance

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds. Year to date, ARKQ is down 2.20% versus a gain of 17.64% for BCTK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while BCTK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.25% against 0.16% for BCTK.

Holdings Overlap

ARKQ already in BCTK43.2%
BCTK already in ARKQ44.5%

43.2% of ARKQ's money is in holdings BCTK also owns. 44.5% of BCTK's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

8 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 39 in BCTK, against full books of 39 and 40.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 25 positions for BCTK that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (46.7% of the fund), and 23 for ARKQ that do not appear in BCTK (51.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKQWeight in BCTKDifference
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies8.28%6.67%1.61%
TSLATesla Inc10.51%3.30%7.21%
NVDANvidia Corp5.97%7.12%1.15%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd3.89%7.78%3.89%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C4.58%6.29%1.71%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.45%4.58%1.13%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.29%3.73%0.56%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.19%5.02%2.83%

44.5% of BCTK is already inside ARKQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKQBCTK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKQ or BCTK?

ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while BCTK charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKQ and BCTK?

44.5% of BCTK's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns. 44.5% of BCTK's is in holdings ARKQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 39 in BCTK.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or BCTK?

ARKQ yields 0.25% while BCTK yields 0.16%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BCTK better than ARKQ?

BCTK led over 1Y. BCTK is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.