ARKQ vs DVDN
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF
Which is better, ARKQ or DVDN?
ARKQ has been ahead.
ARKQ has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARKQ is less concentrated, with 58.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKQ | DVDN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $1.9B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 15.59% |
| Holdings | 39 | 30 |
| YTD Return | -2.20%Best | -29.25% |
| 1Y Return | -3.80%Best | -33.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.76%Best | -11.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.81% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.4% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.8%Best | -45.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $23,392Best | $6,998 |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.9%Best | 70.1% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Kingsbarn Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Mar 17, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
ARKQ vs DVDN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
ARKQ vs DVDN Performance
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is an ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management. Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% while DVDN returned -33.02%. Year to date, ARKQ is down 2.20% versus a loss of 29.25% for DVDN.
Over three years, ARKQ compounded at +30.76% per year against -11.58% for DVDN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.4% compared with 16.4% for DVDN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.8% for ARKQ and -45.9% for DVDN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while DVDN charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $165 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.25% against 15.59% for DVDN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 36 holdings in ARKQ and 16 in DVDN, totalling 99.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 16 in DVDN, against full books of 39 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for DVDN that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (100.0% of the fund), and 30 for ARKQ that do not appear in DVDN (90.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKQ and DVDN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKQ or DVDN?
ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while DVDN charges 1.65%. ARKQ is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKQ or DVDN?
Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% vs -33.02% for DVDN, so ARKQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKQ or DVDN?
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.4% annualized versus 16.4% for DVDN. Worst drawdown: ARKQ -30.8% vs DVDN -45.9%.
Should I hold both ARKQ and DVDN?
ARKQ and DVDN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or DVDN?
ARKQ yields 0.25% while DVDN yields 15.59%, so DVDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DVDN better than ARKQ?
ARKQ has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARKQ is less concentrated, with 58.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.