ARKQ vs FMAG
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs Fidelity Magellan ETF
Which is better, ARKQ or FMAG?
Each has led over a different period.
FMAG has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 3Y, FMAG over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKQ | FMAG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $243M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 39 | 52 |
| YTD Return | -2.20% | +4.66%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.80% | +3.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.76%Best | +17.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.81% | +9.04%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.3% | 17.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.9% | -32.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,564 | $15,414Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.9% | 44.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Feb 2, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 4, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.7 years).
ARKQ vs FMAG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
ARKQ vs FMAG Performance
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% while FMAG returned +3.01%. Year to date, ARKQ is down 2.20% versus a gain of 4.66% for FMAG.
Over three years, ARKQ compounded at +30.76% per year against +17.63% for FMAG; over five years the annualized figures are +7.81% and +9.04% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FMAG has the edge at +10.77% annualized vs +3.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 17.8% for FMAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.9% for ARKQ and -32.9% for FMAG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while FMAG charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.25% against 0.00% for FMAG.
Holdings Overlap
25.8% of ARKQ's money is in holdings FMAG also owns. 31.2% of FMAG's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 50 in FMAG, against full books of 39 and 52.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for FMAG that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (68.2% of the fund), and 24 for ARKQ that do not appear in FMAG (68.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKQ | Weight in FMAG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.97% | 10.24% | 4.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.45% | 6.45% | 3.00% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.58% | 3.28% | 1.30% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.29% | 3.14% | 1.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.19% | 4.55% | 2.36% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 3.89% | 2.01% | 1.88% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.54% | 0.14% |
31.2% of FMAG is already inside ARKQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKQ or FMAG?
ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FMAG charges 0.57%. FMAG is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKQ or FMAG?
Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% vs +3.01% for FMAG, so FMAG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ARKQ annualized +3.82% vs +10.77% for FMAG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKQ or FMAG?
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 17.8% for FMAG. Worst drawdown: ARKQ -59.9% vs FMAG -32.9%.
Should I hold both ARKQ and FMAG?
ARKQ and FMAG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKQ and FMAG?
31.2% of FMAG's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns. 31.2% of FMAG's is in holdings ARKQ also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 50 in FMAG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or FMAG?
ARKQ yields 0.25% while FMAG yields 0.00%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FMAG better than ARKQ?
FMAG has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 3Y, FMAG over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.