ARKQ vs GK
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, ARKQ or GK?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKQ has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, GK over 1Y. ARKQ is less concentrated, with 58.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKQ | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $1.9B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 39 | 60 |
| YTD Return | -2.20% | +10.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.80% | +8.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.76%Best | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.81%Best | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.2% | 23.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -55.7% | -47.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,564Best | $11,347 |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.9%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ARKQ vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ARKQ vs GK Performance
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, ARKQ is down 2.20% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, ARKQ compounded at +30.76% per year against +19.66% for GK; over five years the annualized figures are +7.81% and +2.56% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.2% compared with 23.0% for GK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.7% for ARKQ and -47.7% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $77 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.25% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
21.2% of ARKQ's money is in holdings GK also owns. 26.2% of GK's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns.
GK and ARKQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 27 in GK, against full books of 39 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for GK that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (72.4% of the fund), and 25 for ARKQ that do not appear in GK (69.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
26.2% of GK is already inside ARKQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKQ or GK?
ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GK charges 0.77%. ARKQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKQ or GK?
Over the past year ARKQ returned -3.80% vs +8.34% for GK, so GK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKQ or GK?
ARKQ has been the more volatile fund at 31.2% annualized versus 23.0% for GK. Worst drawdown: ARKQ -55.7% vs GK -47.7%.
Should I hold both ARKQ and GK?
ARKQ and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKQ and GK?
26.2% of GK's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns. 26.2% of GK's is in holdings ARKQ also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or GK?
ARKQ yields 0.25% while GK yields 0.07%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than ARKQ?
ARKQ has a lower expense ratio. ARKQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, GK over 1Y. ARKQ is less concentrated, with 58.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.