ARKQ vs NQLT
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs Neuberger Quality Select ETF
Which is better, ARKQ or NQLT?
NQLT costs less.
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKQ | NQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.48%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 39 | 63 |
| YTD Return | -2.20% | +2.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.80% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.76% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.81% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.9% | 51.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Jul 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ARKQ vs NQLT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ARKQ vs NQLT Performance
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, ARKQ is down 2.20% versus a gain of 2.29% for NQLT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKQ charges 0.75% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $48 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKQ currently yields 0.25% against 0.00% for NQLT.
Holdings Overlap
26.2% of ARKQ's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 21.4% of NQLT's money is in holdings ARKQ also owns.
ARKQ and NQLT share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 39 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 55 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for ARKQ (73.0% of the fund), and 26 for ARKQ that do not appear in NQLT (68.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
26.2% of ARKQ is already inside NQLT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKQ or NQLT?
ARKQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NQLT charges 0.48%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKQ and NQLT?
26.2% of ARKQ's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 21.4% of NQLT's is in holdings ARKQ also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ARKQ and 63 in NQLT.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKQ or NQLT?
ARKQ yields 0.25% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so ARKQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NQLT better than ARKQ?
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.