ARKW vs BROL

ARKW vs BROL

Which is better, ARKW or BROL?

BROL costs less.

BROL has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.

Lower Fees: BROLLess Concentrated: ARKW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKWBROL
Expense Ratio0.76%0.45%Best
AUM$2.0B-
Dividend Yield1.47%0.00%
Holdings88129
YTD Return+7.08%Best+4.42%
1Y Return-5.81%-
3Y Return (annualized)+44.31%-
5Y Return (annualized)+2.38%-
Top 10 Weight44.6%Best44.8%
Fund FamilyArk InvestBaron Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 30, 2014May 25, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ARKW vs BROL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ARKW against instead:ARKW vs SPYARKW vs QQQARKW vs VOOARKW vs VTIBROL against:BROL vs VXUS

ARKW vs BROL Performance

ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) is an ETF from Baron Funds. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 4.42% for BROL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKW charges 0.76% per year while BROL charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $45 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for BROL.

Holdings Overlap

ARKW already in BROL42.6%
BROL already in ARKW35.5%

42.6% of ARKW's money is in holdings BROL also owns. 35.5% of BROL's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 64 in BROL, against full books of 88 and 129.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 44 positions for BROL that do not appear in our book for ARKW (55.3% of the fund), and 25 for ARKW that do not appear in BROL (53.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKWWeight in BROLDifference
NVDANvidia Corp4.34%9.06%4.72%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.31%6.76%3.45%
TSLATesla Inc7.27%1.75%5.52%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies4.50%3.67%0.83%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.62%4.23%0.61%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.59%2.71%0.12%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.26%2.55%0.29%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc4.07%0.48%3.59%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc2.73%1.04%1.69%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc2.27%1.19%1.08%

42.6% of ARKW is already inside BROL.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKWBROL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKW or BROL?

ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while BROL charges 0.45%. BROL is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and BROL?

42.6% of ARKW's money is in holdings BROL also owns. 35.5% of BROL's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 64 in BROL.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or BROL?

ARKW yields 1.47% while BROL yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BROL better than ARKW?

BROL has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.