ARKW vs GK
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, ARKW or GK?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, GK over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 88 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +7.08% | +10.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +8.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31%Best | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | +2.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.2% | 23.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.8% | -47.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,248 | $11,347Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ARKW vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs GK Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, ARKW compounded at +44.31% per year against +19.66% for GK; over five years the annualized figures are +2.38% and +2.56% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.2% compared with 23.0% for GK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.8% for ARKW and -47.7% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $77 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
20.2% of ARKW's money is in holdings GK also owns. 33.9% of GK's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 27 in GK, against full books of 88 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for GK that do not appear in our book for ARKW (64.7% of the fund), and 28 for ARKW that do not appear in GK (69.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKW | Weight in GK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.34% | 8.14% | 3.80% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.31% | 8.15% | 4.84% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.62% | 3.65% | 0.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 4.35% | 1.76% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.27% | 3.75% | 1.48% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.98% | 3.87% | 2.89% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 2.33% | 0.72% | 1.61% |
| GENIGenius Sports Limited | 0.74% | 1.26% | 0.52% |
33.9% of GK is already inside ARKW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or GK?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while GK charges 0.77%. ARKW is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or GK?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +8.34% for GK, so GK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or GK?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 41.2% annualized versus 23.0% for GK. Worst drawdown: ARKW -76.8% vs GK -47.7%.
Should I hold both ARKW and GK?
ARKW and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and GK?
33.9% of GK's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 33.9% of GK's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or GK?
ARKW yields 1.47% while GK yields 0.07%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than ARKW?
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, GK over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.