ARKW vs GQGU
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs GQG US Equity ETF
Which is better, ARKW or GQGU?
Each has led over a different period.
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over the full window, GQGU over 1Y. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | GQGU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $584M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 88 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +7.08%Best | +5.40% |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +3.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.3% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -8.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,659Best | $10,428 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | GQG Partners LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Jul 31, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
ARKW vs GQGU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs GQGU Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while GQGU returned +3.28%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 5.40% for GQGU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 11.8% for GQGU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for ARKW and -8.4% for GQGU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while GQGU charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $49 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.95% for GQGU.
Holdings Overlap
31.4% of ARKW's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 34.1% of GQGU's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 38 in GQGU, against full books of 88 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for GQGU that do not appear in our book for ARKW (62.9% of the fund), and 26 for ARKW that do not appear in GQGU (58.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKW | Weight in GQGU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.34% | 9.37% | 5.03% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.31% | 7.25% | 3.94% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.62% | 6.76% | 3.14% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.26% | 1.68% | 2.58% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 2.56% | 0.03% |
| CRWVCoreweave, Inc. | 3.96% | 1.04% | 2.92% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.73% | 2.10% | 0.63% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.11% | 1.29% | 1.82% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.50% | 0.95% | 1.55% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 0.99% | 1.09% | 0.10% |
34.1% of GQGU is already inside ARKW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or GQGU?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while GQGU charges 0.49%. GQGU is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or GQGU?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +3.28% for GQGU, so GQGU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ARKW annualized +5.03% vs +3.28% for GQGU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or GQGU?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 11.8% for GQGU. Worst drawdown: ARKW -36.2% vs GQGU -8.4%.
Should I hold both ARKW and GQGU?
ARKW and GQGU have a monthly-return correlation of -0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and GQGU?
34.1% of GQGU's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 34.1% of GQGU's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 38 in GQGU.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or GQGU?
ARKW yields 1.47% while GQGU yields 0.95%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GQGU better than ARKW?
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over the full window, GQGU over 1Y. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.