ARKW vs KOOL
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, ARKW or KOOL?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 88 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +7.08% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +16.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.9% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $20,019Best | $14,826 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6% | 42.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
ARKW vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs KOOL Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.9% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for ARKW and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $93 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.43% for KOOL.
Holdings Overlap
19.3% of ARKW's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 16.6% of KOOL's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
ARKW and KOOL share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 44 in KOOL, against full books of 88 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for KOOL that do not appear in our book for ARKW (76.4% of the fund), and 31 for ARKW that do not appear in KOOL (70.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and KOOL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or KOOL?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while KOOL charges 0.93%. ARKW is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or KOOL?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or KOOL?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 33.9% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: ARKW -36.2% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both ARKW and KOOL?
ARKW and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and KOOL?
19.3% of ARKW's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 16.6% of KOOL's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 44 in KOOL.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or KOOL?
ARKW yields 1.47% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than ARKW?
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.