ARKW vs LRGC
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, ARKW or LRGC?
Each has led over a different period.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, LRGC over 1Y. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 88 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +7.08% | +10.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +13.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31%Best | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.9% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $29,823Best | $17,762 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
ARKW vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs LRGC Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Over three years, ARKW compounded at +44.31% per year against +20.81% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.9% compared with 12.5% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for ARKW and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $39 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
20.4% of ARKW's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 27.2% of LRGC's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
LRGC and ARKW share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 88 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 60 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for ARKW (70.1% of the fund), and 31 for ARKW that do not appear in LRGC (71.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
27.2% of LRGC is already inside ARKW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or LRGC?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or LRGC?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so LRGC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or LRGC?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 36.9% annualized versus 12.5% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: ARKW -36.2% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both ARKW and LRGC?
ARKW and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and LRGC?
27.2% of LRGC's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 27.2% of LRGC's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or LRGC?
ARKW yields 1.47% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than ARKW?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, LRGC over 1Y. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.