ARKW vs MTAW

ARKW vs MTAW

Which is better, ARKW or MTAW?

MTAW costs less.

MTAW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.

Lower Fees: MTAWLess Concentrated: ARKW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKWMTAW
Expense Ratio0.76%0.59%Best
AUM$2.0B$2M
Dividend Yield1.47%0.00%
Holdings8825
YTD Return+8.61%Best-1.81%
1Y Return-5.69%-
3Y Return (annualized)+44.94%-
5Y Return (annualized)+2.51%-
Top 10 Weight44.6%Best54.5%
Fund FamilyArk InvestHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 30, 2014Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ARKW vs MTAW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ARKW against instead:ARKW vs SPYARKW vs QQQARKW vs VOOARKW vs VTIMTAW against:MTAW vs VXUS

ARKW vs MTAW Performance

ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ARKW is up 8.61% versus a loss of 1.81% for MTAW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKW charges 0.76% per year while MTAW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $59 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for MTAW.

Holdings Overlap

ARKW already in MTAW23.8%
MTAW already in ARKW39.0%

23.8% of ARKW's money is in holdings MTAW also owns. 39.0% of MTAW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 25 in MTAW, against full books of 88 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 14 positions for MTAW that do not appear in our book for ARKW (44.6% of the fund), and 30 for ARKW that do not appear in MTAW (68.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKWWeight in MTAWDifference
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.26%19.11%14.85%
NVDANvidia Corp4.34%3.50%0.84%
CRWVCoreweave, Inc.3.96%3.68%0.28%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.31%3.17%0.14%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.26%3.90%1.64%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.11%2.73%0.38%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.59%2.92%0.33%

39.0% of MTAW is already inside ARKW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKWMTAW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKW or MTAW?

ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while MTAW charges 0.59%. MTAW is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and MTAW?

39.0% of MTAW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 39.0% of MTAW's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 25 in MTAW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or MTAW?

ARKW yields 1.47% while MTAW yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MTAW better than ARKW?

MTAW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.