ARKW vs NQLT
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs Neuberger Quality Select ETF
Which is better, ARKW or NQLT?
NQLT costs less.
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | NQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.48%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 88 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +7.08%Best | +2.29% |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6%Best | 51.6% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Jul 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ARKW vs NQLT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ARKW vs NQLT Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 2.29% for NQLT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $48 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for NQLT.
Holdings Overlap
18.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 21.4% of NQLT's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
NQLT and ARKW share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 88 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 55 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for ARKW (73.0% of the fund), and 32 for ARKW that do not appear in NQLT (73.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.4% of NQLT is already inside ARKW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or NQLT?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while NQLT charges 0.48%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and NQLT?
21.4% of NQLT's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 21.4% of NQLT's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 63 in NQLT.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or NQLT?
ARKW yields 1.47% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NQLT better than ARKW?
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.