ARKW vs OAIW

ARKW vs OAIW

Which is better, ARKW or OAIW?

OAIW costs less.

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%.

Lower Fees: OAIWLess Concentrated: ARKW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKWOAIW
Expense Ratio0.76%0.59%Best
AUM$2.0B$6M
Dividend Yield1.47%0.00%
Holdings8825
YTD Return+7.08%Best-10.04%
1Y Return-5.81%-
3Y Return (annualized)+44.31%-
5Y Return (annualized)+2.38%-
Top 10 Weight44.6%Best60.5%
Fund FamilyArk InvestHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 30, 2014Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ARKW vs OAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ARKW against instead:ARKW vs SPYARKW vs QQQARKW vs VOOARKW vs VTIOAIW against:OAIW vs VXUS

ARKW vs OAIW Performance

ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (OAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a loss of 10.04% for OAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKW charges 0.76% per year while OAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $59 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for OAIW.

Holdings Overlap

ARKW already in OAIW22.2%
OAIW already in ARKW31.0%

22.2% of ARKW's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 31.0% of OAIW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 26 in OAIW, against full books of 88 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 13 positions for OAIW that do not appear in our book for ARKW (43.5% of the fund), and 30 for ARKW that do not appear in OAIW (69.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKWWeight in OAIWDifference
NVDANvidia Corp4.34%5.11%0.77%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.62%5.62%2.00%
CBRSCerebras Systems Inc - A2.29%5.71%3.42%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.59%4.38%1.79%
CRWVCoreweave, Inc.3.96%2.84%1.12%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.26%4.33%2.07%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.11%3.05%0.06%

31.0% of OAIW is already inside ARKW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKWOAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKW or OAIW?

ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while OAIW charges 0.59%. OAIW is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and OAIW?

31.0% of OAIW's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 31.0% of OAIW's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 26 in OAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or OAIW?

ARKW yields 1.47% while OAIW yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OAIW better than ARKW?

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.